Compulsory health insurance. The continuing American debate

نویسنده

  • Jonathan Liebenau
چکیده

to become exclusively a medical institution focusing on curative procedures, and ultimately to expand its clientele to all levels of society. While large-scale involvement of medical men with hospitals doubtless preceded the administrative-institutional transformation of the latter (medical professionalization around the hospital clinic in France following the Revolution may have been one necessary condition for the late-nineteenth-century transformation of hospitals), Cugnetti's detailed study of the Grenoble instance confirms the lack of interaction between organized medicine (with the partial exception of surgeons) and hospitals during the Old Regime. The curious melange of welfare and penal functions served by the old hospital is evidenced by the Grenoble Hopital General's rules concerning discipline. In the scale of punishment inflicted on troublesome patients, the most severe penalty worse than solitary confinement or ceremonial humiliation was to be exiled from the institution. Toby Gelfand University of Ottawa

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Foul weather friends: big business and health care reform in the 1990s in historical perspective.

Existing accounts of the Clinton health reform efforts of the early 1990s neglect to examine how the change in big business reform interests during the short period between the late 1980s and 1994 might have altered the trajectory of compulsory health insurance legislation in Congress. This article explores evidence that big employers lost their early interest in reform because they believed th...

متن کامل

Almost persuaded. American physicians and compulsory health insurance, 1912-1920.

Imagine that you get such certain awesome experience and knowledge by only reading a book. How can? It seems to be greater when a book can be the best thing to discover. Books now will appear in printed and soft file collection. One of them is this book almost persuaded american physicians and compulsory health insurance 1912 1920. It is so usual with the printed books. However, many people som...

متن کامل

Why Medicare Part A and Part B, as Well as Medicaid?

In the years before the Medicare and Medicaid programs were enacted in 1965, various groups had strong ideas about their possible structures. At one extreme were those who believed that Medicare should be a social insurance program covering all health care for the persons covered, on a compulsory basis, financed by payroll taxes, with a public assistance program as a safety net. At the other ex...

متن کامل

Alternative health insurance schemes: a welfare comparison.

In this paper, we present a simple model of health insurance with asymmetric information, where we compare two alternative ways of organizing the insurance market. Either as a competitive insurance market, where some risks remain uninsured, or as a compulsory scheme, where however, the level of reimbursement of loss is to be determined by majority decision. In a simple welfare comparison, the c...

متن کامل

Welfare effects of supplementary insurance: a comment.

This issue of the Journal features two papers, Community Rating of Health Insurance and Different Benefit Packages by Matthias Kifman and Alternative Health Insurance Schemes: A Welfare Comparison by Hansen and Keiding, that examine the welfare implications of permitting voluntary supplementary insurance in a regime with a community-rated, compulsory basic insurance package. This is a critical ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Medical History

دوره 28  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1984